“This Supreme Court ruling reaffirms the importance of upholding national laws over local ordinances and highlights the need for a balanced approach in urban development and environmental preservation”
In a recent and significant ruling, the Supreme Court has invalidated the Quezon City government’s actions against the Manila Seedling Bank Foundation.
This decision, given on July 30, 2024, and publicized on Aug. 8, 2024, marked a critical juncture in a protracted legal battle over the ownership and use of a valuable seven-hectare property in Metro Manila.
The Manila Seedling Bank Foundation, a non-profit institution dedicated to environmental conservation, has long managed a property originally designated for green space and environmental purposes.
This land was provided to MSBF through Proclamation 1670 signed by then President Ferdinand Marcos, granting the foundation usufructuary rights for 50 years, which extend until 2027. This law specifically designated the property for environmental use, including reforestation efforts.
However, in 2014, the Quezon City government sought to seize the property due to alleged non-payment of real property taxes.
This move followed the city’s 2003 reclassification of the property from its original environmental use to a Metropolitan Commercial Zone, contrary to its original designation.
The QC government’s actions included foreclosing on and auctioning off the property, demolishing structures, and attempting to repurpose it for commercial development.
Supreme Court’s ruling
The Supreme Court’s ruling, penned by Associate Justice Ramon Paul Hernando, overturns the QC government’s foreclosure and reclassification efforts.
Key aspects of the ruling include:
Tax-Exempt Status: The Court reaffirmed that MSBF is a tax-exempt entity due to its nature and its alignment with national environmental objectives. Therefore, the Quezon City government’s attempt to foreclose on the property for non-payment of taxes was legally unfounded.
Invalidation of Zoning Changes: The Court invalidated the 2003 amendment to the Quezon City zoning ordinance, which had reclassified the property from its original designation under Proclamation No. 1670.
The ruling underscores that local ordinances cannot override state-enacted laws, emphasizing the supremacy of national legislation over municipal regulations.
Restoration of Usufructuary Rights: The ruling underscores the importance of adhering to the usufructuary rights granted to MSBF, established to protect and preserve the environmental integrity of the property.
Legal basis and precedents
The Supreme Court’s decision draws on well-established legal principles:
Supremacy of National Law: Local government ordinances cannot contravene national legislation.
This principle has been consistently upheld in Philippine jurisprudence, emphasizing that municipal regulations must align with national statutes.
Cases such as Hernandez v. Court of Appeals (G.R. 106154, 1999) reinforce this hierarchical relationship.
Tax-Exempt Entities: The Court recognized MSBF’s status as a tax-exempt entity under national law, reinforcing precedents like Philippine National Red Cross v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (G.R. 182608, 2012), which affirms the protection of tax-exempt entities’ property.
Recommendations
To the Quezon City Government:
Review and amend local zoning laws to align with national legislation and prevent future conflicts.
Engage in negotiations with MSBF to resolve any outstanding issues and restore any damaged properties or operations.
To the Manila Seedling Bank Foundation:
Pursue legal remedies for any losses sustained due to the foreclosure and demolition.
Work with local and national environmental agencies to reinforce its role and contributions to environmental conservation.
This ruling reaffirms the importance of upholding national laws over local ordinances and highlights the need for a balanced approach in urban development and environmental preservation.
